I've never heard of a Unifi 5-port switch. (Toughswitch, yes, but not in the Unifi line.) So you'd be looking at 8 ports, in 0, 60, or 150W PoE versions. As long as you don't need PoE on any of these, then just go with the US-8(0) so you can manage it from the Unifi controller. The Toughswitches are great, but 1) Not manageable via Unifi, and 2) the 5-port version is 24V output only. The 24V would be fine for your current AC-Lites, but wouldn't work with the AC-Pro, or the AC-HD, or the majority of PoE gear in the world. Likewise worthy of note - the US-8-60 is 48V PoE only. That means that it would power the majority of PoE gear in the world, but NOT your AC-Lites. (/sigh.) If budget allows, I would go for the US-8-150 because they are selectable 24/48V, thus can support anything, they have PoE on all 8 ports (vs 4 on the US-8-60 and 0 on the US-8) AND have dual SFP ports, because Fiber! Here's the page for the US-8 and the US-8-60. And you're likely already familiar with the US-8-150. Toughswitch page/spec sheet is here: - good switches, but you manage everything else via Unifi controller, might as well keep that capability, imo. I ran into this issue last summer where I order one and got not what I expected. Thaare bina lage nahi mara jiya mp3 song download download. I have a large amount of virtual memory allocated. At the moment I’m not using any objects, I’m only supporting English in the installation, and I am not using a skin file. I have 30+ GB free on each drive. I have cleaned up my Temp folders and removed any unused temp files. Config.boot.erl for an EdgeRouter Lite; config.boot.erx for an EdgeRouter X; config.boot.poe for an EdgeRouter POE; This is a good time to thank Bryan Klinger for initially converting one of my early v1.7 Google Fiber ER-Lite configs to his ER-POE. Connect an Ethernet cable from the Ethernet port of your computer to the port labeled eth0 on the EdgeRouter Lite. Configure the Ethernet adapter on your host system with a static IP address on the 192.168.1.x subnet. Launch your web browser. Let me explain as far as I understand. The unifi models are all intended to be managed from a single console. That console can be cloud based or you can host the console (free) on your hardware on site. The console gives you the ability to setup policies and settings to manage all of your unifi based equipment from a single interface. Its great since you only need to define your network once and all unifi devices will know about it. The down side is the unifi console only allows you to manage basic features (which maybe all some need). Now the non unifi (ES) devices must be configured manually on each device, but you then have greater control over the configuration of the device. So what do you choose. Well if you are only going to have one or two devices you may be better off with the ES models. If you are going to buy into the Ubiquity ecosystem then the unifi model is the way to go. That unifi models include firewall, switches, access points, and (something else I'm forgetting). If you want to control all of that from a single pane of glass then the unifi models are the way to go. To the EdgeRouters they are solid little routers. They are pretty inexpensive for what they can do. I have an edgerouter lite as my home router. A major use case we have for the ER Lite is secure remote access to industrial controls systems, which is where the fully configurable CLI is very advantageous.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |